Views
Questions and comments from the workshop on 3/28
implications of who was chosen to speak to?
list received from chris and wilson - chosen mainly because of mellon funding
picking people who are building things?
Chris - requested study for quidelines for up coming projects, which approach to take, can OSIDs? do it
hard to judge success, there is not a clear picture of what that means in the context of OKI
wasn't a survey of everyone working on OSIDs?, but a representative of that universe
interoperability, did you look at as desired for a particular project, or other people that could benefit such as projects that need to interoperate with your project
short answer - yes
the group that will benefit is not necessarily the group providing the funding
definitions - what is interoperability exactly
getting to that
what Don W is hearing is using tools, data, operations, etc. They all have different implications. is there a focus on those
depends on project context otherwise there is no answer to what it means
finding ROI picture - there is another dimension for groups
Surprised over shape of graph, in that models are less useful during development phase
there is another dimension, in that style matters
same problem could be addressed by different styles
Ira - When thinking about osids, thinks of 2 activities - developing implementations - takes a fair amount of effort, and an individual user may see no benefit - second use is using it. deploying a particualr implementation - this would save a user effort. The question is did you discuss both aspects with folks. Not clear from the report.
the question will be answered more later. need to discuss particular osids, and not as a whole
there are few implementations for some osids, making re-use difficult
to get value of the osids, requires a network effect, i.e., other users who can make use of an implementation
if we can build communities in other areas then the network effect can be realized
if other people are making the pitch, not just MIT, then greater chance for success
look for a crowd
on risk - cost of changing standards, maturity, etc, in theory they help minimize risks, but there is a risk involved as well.
adapting to a standard also costs